All posts

· 3 min read · The Downballot team

Why Downballot is partisan, and why we say so on the homepage

Most software companies selling into politics work very hard to sound like they are not in politics. The website says "for organizations that engage communities." The case studies have the logos blurred. Ask directly and you get a sentence about being a neutral platform.

We decided to do the opposite. Downballot is for progressive and Democratic organizations, it says so in the footer of every page, and applications from anyone else are declined.

Here is the reasoning, because it is a real trade and we would rather show our work than have it read as a slogan.

Neutrality is a cost, not a feature

A vendor that serves everyone has to build for everyone. Every default becomes a setting. Every opinion becomes a configuration screen. The product gets wider and shallower, and the people using it spend their first week deciding things the vendor could have decided for them.

Being partisan lets us pick defaults and mean them. When a county party opens Downballot for the first time, the vocabulary it starts with is the vocabulary that county parties actually use. We did not have to make that neutral enough for someone with a different theory of what a precinct is.

It shortens the sales conversation to nothing

A committee evaluating a vendor asks the partisan question eventually. If the answer is on the homepage, the question never gets asked and nobody spends a call on it.

More usefully, it works in the other direction too. A state party maintaining a list of recommended tools needs to know where a vendor stands before it can put them on the list at all. "We are neutral" is a disqualifying answer for that list, not a safe one.

The uncomfortable half

Two things this costs, said plainly.

It halves the market. That is the whole point, and it is still a real number. We think a tool that fits one half properly beats a tool that fits neither, but we are aware which way that bet could go.

It is a claim we have to actually enforce. Saying you screen applications and then not screening them is worse than never saying it. So we check: the organization's website, and the office or jurisdiction on the application. It is not a sophisticated process. It is a person spending two minutes, every Monday, and it will occasionally be wrong in both directions.

What this does not mean

It does not mean the product has a political opinion inside it. There is no scoring model, no recommended messaging, no nudge toward a strategy. Downballot is a task tracker and a contact database. What is partisan is who we will sell it to, not what it does once you have it.

And it does not mean we think the software is only useful to one side. It almost certainly is not. We are choosing not to find out.